Claude Code costs up to $200 a month. Goose does the same thing for free.

الأصول والمواضيع المتأثرة

نبرة المقال

التأثير المتوقع على السوق

مسار الأدلة

دورة حياة التوقّع

• Free Analysis Rule Based Analysis ليس ذكاءً اصطناعياً FIVE Neutral 50% 6h
  أُنشئ في → 6 س → مُستبعَد

  Expired: not evaluated within 7 days of its 6h timeframe elapsing

• Free Analysis Rule Based Analysis ليس ذكاءً اصطناعياً MAX Neutral 50% 6h
  أُنشئ في → 6 س → مُستبعَد

  Expired: not evaluated within 7 days of its 6h timeframe elapsing

• Free Analysis Rule Based Analysis ليس ذكاءً اصطناعياً PLUS Neutral 50% 6h
  أُنشئ في → 6 س → مُستبعَد

  Expired: not evaluated within 7 days of its 6h timeframe elapsing

• Free Analysis Rule Based Analysis ليس ذكاءً اصطناعياً RARE Neutral 50% 6h
  أُنشئ في → 6 س → مُستبعَد

  Expired: not evaluated within 7 days of its 6h timeframe elapsing

• Free Analysis Rule Based Analysis ليس ذكاءً اصطناعياً SAN Neutral 50% 6h
  أُنشئ في → 6 س → مُستبعَد

  Expired: not evaluated within 7 days of its 6h timeframe elapsing

• Free Analysis Rule Based Analysis ليس ذكاءً اصطناعياً GOOGL Neutral 50% 6h
  أُنشئ في → 6 س → مُستبعَد

  Expired: not evaluated within 7 days of its 6h timeframe elapsing

يُسجَّل وقت النشر، ويُقيَّم تلقائياً بمجرد انتهاء النافذة الزمنية — دون أي تعديل.

المصدر الأصلي

The artificial intelligence coding revolution comes with a catch: it's expensive.Claude Code, Anthropic's terminal-based AI agent that can write, debug, and deploy code autonomously, has captured the imagination of software developers worldwide. But its pricing — ranging from $20 to $200 per month depending on usage — has sparked a growing rebellion among the very programmers it aims to serve.Now, a free alternative is gaining traction. Goose, an open-source AI agent developed by Block (the financial technology company formerly known as Square), offers nearly identical functionality to Claude Code but runs entirely on a user's local machine. No subscription fees. No cloud dependency. No rate limits that reset every five hours."Your data stays with you, period," said Parth Sareen, a software engineer who demonstrated the tool during a recent livestream. The comment captures the core appeal: Goose gives developers complete control over their AI-powered workflow, including the ability to work offline — even on an airplane.The project has exploded in popularity. Goose now boasts more than 26,100 stars on GitHub, the code-sharing platform, with 362 contributors and 102 releases since its launch. The latest version, 1.20.1, shipped on January 19, 2026, reflecting a development pace that rivals commercial products.For developers frustrated by Claude Code's pricing structure and usage caps, Goose represents something increasingly rare in the AI industry: a genuinely free, no-strings-attached option for serious work.Anthropic's new rate limits spark a developer revoltTo understand why Goose matters, you need to understand the Claude Code pricing controversy.Anthropic, the San Francisco artificial intelligence company founded by former OpenAI executives, offers Claude Code as part of its subscription tiers. The free plan provides no access whatsoever. The Pro plan, at $17 per month with annual billing (or $20 monthly), limits users to just 10 to 40 prompts every five hours — a constraint that serious developers exhaust within minutes of intensive work.The Max plans, at $100 and $200 per month, offer more headroom: 50 to 200 prompts and 200 to 800 prompts respectively, plus access to Anthropic's most powerful model, Claude 4.5 Opus. But even these premium tiers come with restrictions that have inflamed the developer community.In late July, Anthropic announced new weekly rate limits. Under the system, Pro users receive 40 to 80 hours of Sonnet 4 usage per week. Max users at the $200 tier get 240 to 480 hours of Sonnet 4, plus 24 to 40 hours of Opus 4. Nearly five months later, the frustration has not subsided.The problem? Those "hours" are not actual hours. They represent token-based limits that vary wildly depending on codebase size, conversation length, and the complexity of the code being processed. Independent analysis suggests the actual per-session limits translate to roughly 44,000 tokens for Pro users and 220,000 tokens for the $200 Max plan."It's confusing and vague," one developer wrote in a widely shared analysis. "When they say '24-40 hours of Opus 4,' that doesn't really tell you anything useful about what you're actually getting."The backlash on Reddit and developer forums has been fierce. Some users report hitting their daily limits within 30 minutes of intensive coding. Others have canceled their subscriptions entirely, calling the new restrictions "a joke" and "unusable for real work."Anthropic has defended the changes, stating that the limits affect fewer than five percent of users and target people running Claude Code "c

اقرأ المقال كاملاً على VentureBeat

المقال الأصلي منشور بواسطة VentureBeat في يناير 19, 2026. التحليل والرؤى المقدمة من AnalystMarkets AI.

المزيد من سردية FIVE

• 22:30 Five Below Lifts Outlook, Aims to Ramp Up Appeal to Gen Alpha Bloomberg
• 05:39 Russia strikes Ukraine capital for sixth straight day, killing at least 9 South China Morning Post
• 04:00 A collective capability boundary in frontier large language models on guideline-conformant and case-specific oncology decision-making arXiv
• 04:00 Statutory AI: Aligning Large Language Models With Legal Norms arXiv